The Autistic Yogi Considers the use of Hypothesis in Forming Opinions and Correcting Knowledge

  In the years since I immersed myself deeply into the movement and function of our bodies and minds, I have noticed a huge tendency in people to misconstrue science. There is this approach in viewing science as a set of facts, buts not a set of facts, science is a process, you formulate a hypothesis and go about trying to falsify that hypothesis. If it is falsified than the hypothesis needs to be revamped and attempted to falsified again.
  Each person maintains the right to change their opinion at any moment that information that makes better sense then what their opinion was before. This can come about by a person considering their own thoughts and ideas or having ideas of others presented.
  When approaching a hypothesis, do not just seek information that supports your theory, but check to see if their is in fact opposing theories or anything between. Ask pertinent questions that both look at showing truth of the hypothesis but find questions that can put hypothesis under scrutiny and attempt to falsify, this leads to a greater knowledge set.
  Hypothesis don't need to completely be changed when falsified, but they need to be reconsidered and reformed subtlety or majorly so they can be tested again.
  When a person loves their knowledge so much that they can't budge from it, regardless of presentation there is a problem and communication can no longer happen in a conducive method that discussion would flow. Resentment builds and leads to actions that are typically reactive rather than responsive.