How many people have you encountered in your life that you thought that you would never want to work with? How many co-workers have you had that you wish you had never had to deal with?
We all have bad days and get on each other's nerves, but this is not what I am pointing to. I am talking about those people who are consistently an aggravation in the workplace. Those individuals that at the end of the day have cost the company/organization more in expenses than they can recoup through that individual's efforts even though they are adequately trained or have the knowledge to do their job.
Not all those individuals work because they want to, but because there is no other choice, they are living in a system that has failed them or at the very least is not designed for them. There should be money for every person on this planet to meet the basic necessities of life and having a bit extra so they can indulge in at least a base form of entertainment.
Defining Entertainment
What is entertainment? Entertainment is whatever an individual finds captivating or interesting at the time. Having enough monetary surplus beyond the absolute necessities of life would allow each person, regardless of capacity to have the opportunity to experience joy while they are here on the planet. With something like the connectivity of the internet and more and more individuals gaining access to the worldwide resource of communication and knowledge increases our capacity to share in these communities of entertainment.
Some people find math entertaining, some playing sports, some watching sports, some find words entertaining either in spelling or tracking its history, some find crafting and art entertaining, either viewing it or making it or using it in some way. Some people find dance or work entertaining. None of us get to dictate what another finds entertaining. But there does need to be some guidelines to work within so that we don't lose an individual to the depths of unlawful debauchery, theft, murder, etc. There needs to be the capacity to indulge in lawful entertainment that is not dictated by the community at large but is established on the fact of what is good and bad and neutral.
Conformity needs to end
We live in a culture and society that attempts to conform every individual to what the masses seemingly are like and tends to be based on assumptions of logic and come from generations of convincing the brain matter of those specific cultures that their perceptions and views are valid and completely accurate. But they are not and have a great tendency to be influenced by religious, business, and political propaganda.
Attempting to conserve what is perceived as the heirlooms of cultural thought can and is extremely destructive and leads otherwise good people to exercise thoughts that are very harmful. Example, "Spanking is fine because my parents spanked me and I turned out alright." This form of fallacy permeates humanity and takes anecdotal or misquoted or poorly conducted research out of context to the whole of reality. Fact is that spanking a child is more likely to create maladjustment (not in all circumstances but has a marked increase in violent tendencies once the individual is an adult.)
Capacity as leader and filter
Conformity says that each person must contribute equally in order to have anything at all. This is pure rubbish thought because we know factually that not all individuals are equal in capacity and or contribution. We have many who contribute far less then what they are able for various reasons and those that contribute far more than they ought to be for various reasons. The system is harmful inherently and only appeals to those that would turn a blind eye to the needy, or those born into lesser circumstances.
What is the progression of humanity?
As we gain more and more insights into the nature of humanity and all things, the easier it is going to be for us to set up environments that are conducive for each person to contribute in a meaningful way to the progression of humanity.
Progression currently is in the form of inventing a thing that earns a patent or creates a company in order to make an individual or group of individuals rich by making something marketable. This is not progression and is simply masked form of greed and hate. Greed because it appeals to the love for money, and hate for it creating pleasure in being greater than someone else.
Progression is advancing not just ourselves, community, or nation, but is advancing our species and being able to survive any calamity no matter how small or great and to encourage the experience of humanity in a lawful manner.
I believe a good start to the view of what is human progression is in the Kardashev Scale. It is the scale that is used by SETI in its search for extraterrestrial intelligence. The question had to be asked when we set up this program 'What is it that we are looking for to confirm other intelligent life in the universe?'. Which comes down to how a species utilizes energy. We don't even measure up to a level 1 civilization yet.
In order to achieve a level 1 civilization, we must be able to fully utilize the energy that our sun directs towards our earth. We must not have the largest reliance on fossil fuels (oil, gas, coal) and must be able to rely on the energy of the spitting atom, be that from our sun or from our own nuclear or fission/fusion technologies. Throughout the universe, we know that suns exist, but we do not, however, know that there are fossil fuels that can be easily accessed or even the fuel to power specific nuclear technologies. We must be able to utilize not just the solar rays that reach the surface of the earth, but literally any solar ray that reaches our atmosphere. We must surpass the concept that solar power is only useful when the sun shines because it is always shining 100% of the time and the only way it will not is for a catastrophic event of solar system wide magnitude.
At its simplest human progression is how we utilize energy and for what ends. Can we get to a system that if your ends are lawful that you will be able to have all the energy you need supplied to get to those ends?
Do we value human creativity and the process of going through the learning of the individuals own process or do we demand that process to conform to tradition and capatilist prosperity?